about the dialogue [daniel melero]
01. La does not represent the image presented, it vanishes. In the image that overturned, it reorganizes the redetermination as per your requirements.
02. It seems that the image dominates the thing. But it is a domination that is not imposed, it does not set or misleading, that does not oppress or works from any of the operations of power that had been used to denounce them as their own domination. The image is so realistic that goes through the same thing. And even the times when it is clear that this is not a thing but its image, the thing immediately accept that this image is his model, his guidance and aspiration. 03. In the contemporary imagery, the image is the image of experience happens outside, today's experience occurs in
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
Does Brent Everett Have A Yahoo Messenger
image.
image is what is experienced, and no resemblance to what was experienced. 
04. Experience-image is the image of the experience. This was a sense worked (an ad hoc development if the experience was blind subjection or reproduced if the experience was a mere anecdote, but this matter was always a vital system, significantly, the world). In contrast, experience-image is an unprocessed consumption, something like a swallow without digestion, something like a trauma as no effect of sense, as no orders, ask for more. Experience-image is the story the infinite need more picture. It sounds like a mess of stimuli with subjective disordering effect which in turn has the effect of seeking to arm itself with more subjective image, and so on without end. Experience-image is a subject (or something) that looks complete with a promise (the image) that are excited to complete and is made descompletándolo, it is ready for the next promise. That is what we always say: the latest model cell that you buy nowadays has a replacement model before reaching your hands. The sense of the classic image of the whole experience just imaginary, true, but it was much more firmly to the subject the recurrent experience of an aspiration "realistic" never achieved. 
[the first three points are excerpts from "Only the images. What things? (Reviews the book "only things" Agustín Valle) "available in
http://www.pablohupert.com.ar
]
[image source http://cabezadeliebre.blogspot.com/ ]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment